Franklin Delano Roosevelt And The New Deal - 1987 Words

Franklin Delano Roosevelt was born in Hyde Park on January 30, 1882. Roosevelt, at age 28, ran for New York State senate where he fought political machines. He became the thirty second president of America in the year 1933, the worst year in the Great Depression. Roosevelt became president as a democrat. He was also president during World War II. Roosevelt was diagnosed with polio in 1921 and was paralyzed in his legs. He obtained polio when he was on a vacation in Campobello Island. In 1944 Roosevelt was diagnosed with congestive heart failure and on April 12 of 1945, only two months after the Yalta conference, Roosevelt suffered a severe stroke and died. Roosevelt had two policies, The New Deal Policy and the Good Neighbor Policy. Roosevelt’s domestic policy was known as â€Å"The New Deal†. In the New Deal, Roosevelt temporary closed the banks and formed the â€Å"Brain Trust†. Roosevelt adopted the â€Å"Good Neighbor† foreign policy, which was creat ed to help improve relationships with other countries in the Western hemisphere, specifically Central America and South America. FDR’s foreign and domestic policies had the opportunity to succeed, but because of the time FDR was elected president, they both, in the long run, failed. FDR was sworn into office on March 4, 1933. Roosevelt had become president during the worst year of the depression. During Roosevelt’s campaign, he promised, â€Å"Happy days are here again† (Franklin Roosevelt, 1932). What he was promising was an end to the GreatShow MoreRelatedFranklin Delano Roosevelt and the New Deal2344 Words   |  9 Pagesonly thing we have to fear is fear itself †¦ Franklin Delano Roosevelt’s New Deal program focused on provided relief, recovery and reform to struggling Americans. The New Deal both conservative and radical relied on heavy government intervention, to diminish the strain and prevent a repeat of the Great Depression. The New Deal set out to provided relief for the needy, economic recovery and reform to basic government institutions. Although the New Deal, was not a complete success it created a politicalRead MorePresident Franklin Delano Roosevelt And The New Deal2055 Words   |  9 PagesPresident Franklin Delano Roosevelt attempted to address the issues of the Great Depression through his New Deal. The New Deal was a series of acts and programs passed in order to help the nation to recover from the economic downturn and prevent future economic problems. This series of policies can be broken down into three categories: relief, recovery, and reform. Relief was used initially to bring the population back to work and lower unemployment. Recovery was used later and was to deal with theRead MorePresident Franklin Delano Roosevelt s New Deal1364 Words   |  6 PagesWhen people think of President Franklin Delano Roosevelt, they see a President that inherited a horrible economy and turned it arou nd through his popular New Deal. He also led us through a World War. However, when different perspectives are taken into account, Roosevelt’s New Deal wasn’t the economic restorer that it is thought to be. The New Deal actually hindered the United States’ recovery. The New Deal prolonged the Great Depression because the New Deal inhibited the private sector, it droveRead MoreFranklin Delano Roosevelt and His New Deal Essay2319 Words   |  10 PagesFranklin Delano Roosevelt and His New Deal The 1932 presidential election came in the midst of the greatest economic depression experienced by the American people. Never before in the history of the United States has pessimism been so universal. The descent from the height of prosperity of the late 1920s had been rapid, bringing fear and uncertainty. By March 1932 approximately 12 million men and women were unemployed. By March 1933 unemployment had reached 13.5 million. In the hard-hitRead MoreFranklin Delano Roosevelts Presidency Essay1190 Words   |  5 PagesFranklin Delano Roosevelt was our nations thirty second president. Unlike all the other presidents Franklin Delano Roosevelt was elected for four consecutive terms. However he died in the first year of his fourth term. During his prolonged presidency Franklin Delano Roosevelt did many incredible things as our Nations leader. He pulled us out of the great depression, dealt with civil rights issues, created many reforms for our nation including the twenty-first a mendment, handled the attack on PearlRead MorePresident Lincoln And George Washington846 Words   |  4 Pagesdesperate times stands out among many other of our nation s leaders. Franklin Delano Roosevelt had a difficult life that gave him the opportunity to see from the eyes of others who struggled, and use that to help them. Franklin Roosevelt grew up in luxury among millionaires of New York. He was born on January 30,1882 into a life of wealth and privilege on their 600 acre estate in Hyde Park, New York (â€Å"Franklin Delano Roosevelt†). His father was a Wall Street lawyer and his mother was a â€Å"societyRead MoreAnalysis Of Franklin Delano Roosevelt s Life And Education1717 Words   |  7 PagesBody of Research Franklin Delano Roosevelt was born January 30, 1882 in Hyde Park, New York as an only child to a rich couple. â€Å"Franklin’s family had been prominent for several generations, having made their fortune in real estate and trade. Roosevelt was the only child of James Roosevelt and Sara Ann Delano Roosevelt. The family lived at Springwood, their estate in the Hudson River Valley in New York State.†(Biography.com Editors, pg.1).As previously inquired, the fact that Roosevelt had been bornRead MoreBook Review on Fdr Essay1088 Words   |  5 PagesMeagan Beckwith U.S History 1302 23 June 2013 Professor Wooten Book Review on Franklin D. Roosevelt Franklin D. Roosevelt was the 32nd President of the United States. While being president he was trying to lead our country through a time of economic depression and total war. Franklin D. Roosevelt was one of the most important leaders of the 20th century. Alan Brinkley, the author of Franklin Delano Roosevelt, wrote this biography in order to show Roosevelt’s life from childhood to presidencyRead MorePresident Franklin Roosevelt And The Great Depression1293 Words   |  6 Pageslate 1930s lead to the presidential election of Franklin Delano Roosevelt and the led to changes in the United States following the Great Depression. The United States developed into the modern welfare state by 1945 in which was the end of World War II. The specific examples that relate to the changes in 1920 to 1945 are the dollar diplomacy in Haiti and Nicaragua, the first and second New deal established by president Franklin Delano Roosevelt, and the Wagner Act as well as the war productionRea d MoreFranklin Delano Roosevelt s Life And Education1592 Words   |  7 PagesFranklin Delano Roosevelt was born January 30, 1882 in Hyde Park, New York as an only child to a rich couple. â€Å"Franklin’s family had been prominent for several generations, having made their fortune in real estate and trade. Roosevelt was the only child of James Roosevelt and Sara Ann Delano Roosevelt. The family lived at Springwood, their estate in the Hudson River Valley in New York State.†(Biography.com Editors, pg.1).As previously inquired, the fact that Roosevelt had been born to a rich family

The parallels between The Crucible and the Rwanda Genocide...

The Parallels between The Crucible and The Rwanda Genocide The themes of justice, community and sacrifice in The Crucible are universal and can be identified in many modern events in history, including the Rwanda Genocide. The genocide in Rwanda and The Salem Witch Hunts in The Crucible have many striking similarities, primarily these are: the hunting down and killing of a group of people identified as being different, the mass killing of people for no valid reason and the taking of revenge on a whole group of people for the acts of one or more individuals of that group. Common to these two events is the ruthless hunting down of victims. The judges in The Crucible pressure Abigail and the girls for the names of possible witches. Their†¦show more content†¦The Hutu’s believe the Tutsi’s were trying to regain power. There was a long history of rivalry and violence between these two tribes and the killing of the president was the catalyst ignited the voracious flames of revenge. The Hutu’s began their manhunt to find and kill the Tutsi’s in revenge for the years of perceived oppression when the Tutsi’s ruled Rwanda. Like John Proctor in The Crucible, there too is a protagonist in the Rwanda Genocide – Paul Rusesabagina. They both display strength in standing up for what is right, they refuse to betray their friends and they both show great courage to do what is right, even if it means sacrificing themselves. In The Crucible, as things start to get out of hand, John takes it on himself to stand up to the authority and set things right. Even when standing up against the church places suspicion on him, John will not compromise his beliefs and fights for what he believes is right. This is the same fight Paul Rusesabagina undertakes. Paul refuses to fall into the violence and hatred between the Hutu’s and Tutsi’s. He questions the idea that Hutu’s are better than Tutsi’s. He himself, a Hutu, is married to a Tutsi and he will not let himself be threatened into changing his beliefs or into following what the other Hutu’s are doing. As a Hutu, Paul is expected to despise the Tutsi’s and to be a part of the violence and

Wall Street Free Essays

string(43) " promotes dishonesty in business dealings\." How far will you go to be successful? How far will you go to win? Nothing can illustrate the lengths that a person is willing to take just to profit than in the cutthroat world of stocks. And no place in the world is more ruthless than Wall Street. Wall Street (Stone, 1987) takes its viewers to a behind-the-scenes look at this place in the world where people live and feed on stocks. We will write a custom essay sample on Wall Street or any similar topic only for you Order Now The entirety of the film tackles a lot of moral conflicts that are involved in the business dealings done within the movie. This is Oliver Stone’s criticism of the mentality of the people who utilized illegal means just to get the biggest profit in the quickest time. Stone criticism not only targeted the corporate raiders whose practices were being exposed in the insider trading scandal in the 1980s, but it was a critique on the quick-buck culture that was prevalent then and even at this time. THE PLOT The plot is traditional and formulaic. A young hotshot, wanting to be successful, gets the opportunity when his persistence pays off as he is hired by a famous veteran. The rookie takes on the job albeit the discovery of the illegalities of the methods. He gets the perks and the movie shows its audience the grandiose rewards he gets. When a conflict of interest arises, he goes against the veteran. He loses everything yet he gets his payback. This has been a formula for a number of movies, and Wall Street is no exception. The young, idealistic hotshot here is Bud Fox, played by Charlie Sheen. He is a stockbroker for a lesser-known Wall Street firm. The hotshot is a dreamer. In one scene in the movie where he just lost a lot of money because of a client, he utters that he dreams of being on the other side of the call sometimes. In subsequent scenes too, it can be observed that Bud does not dream of being a stockbroker forever. To achieve that dream, he constantly calls the office of his hero for a chance of getting an audience and ultimately, impressing him to gain employment under his hero’s wing. The veteran, excessively rich and wealthy, and the movie protagonist’s hero is Gordon Gekko. This role led Michael Douglas to garnering an Academy Award of Lead Performance by an Actor. He is indeed truly worthy of the award as he portrayed the cold and vicious yet in some way appealing Gekko to the hilt. Gekko represents the ultimate corporate raider, the Wall Street shark who buys and closes down companies under their noses for his profit. Yet his methods, though disagreeable, are effective and masterfully justified as evidenced by his Greed is good speech in the movie (to be discussed later). On Gekko’s birthday, Bud shows up in Gekko’s office with a box of Davidoff cigars as a present and a bribe to finally get the opportunity he has been waiting for. Desperate to impress Gekko, Bud blurts out insider information that his father Carl (played by Martin Sheen, Charlie’s real-life father) revealed to him about BlueStar airlines. Carl works for BlueStar and also serves as a union leader there. When Gekko profits out of Bud’s tip, he saw something in the kid that he liked. He saw the killer instinct, the will and determination to do whatever it takes to succeed. He saw a bit of himself in Bud, as he revealed later on in the movie. He then employs Bud to work for him but not as an ordinary broker. He asks Bud to spy on his competition and other illegal acts. At first, Bud hesitates but he eventually agrees. He is rewarded with his works, and not without extravagance. Bud enjoys the luxurious life that his work with Gekko provided for him. The main conflict of the film arises when Bud decides to make BlueStar competitive. Bud enthusiastically pushes forward his proposals to Gekko. Gekko, on the other hand, agrees with the proposals armed with contrasting intentions compared to that of Bud’s. When Gekko and Bud present their plan to BlueStar representatives, including Carl, Carl voices out his opposition as he sees behind the guise that Gekko puts on. Yet, Bud remains to be sold by Gekko’s deception. It did not take much time before Bud realizes what Gekko’s plan really is. When Bud learns that Gekko plans to sell the hangars and planes, he confronts Gekko. When asked why he was wrecking BlueStar, Gekko answers, â€Å"Because it’s wreckable.† From there, Bud sets off a plan to save BlueStar. Eventually they do but not without consequences. Bud is arrested for illegal insider trading by the SEC. Still, he manages to get payback as he lures Gekko into a trap and thus managing to record Gekko’s confession of guilt on tape. The film ends with Bud walking on the steps of a courthouse on his way to his sentencing. ISSUES The Quick-Buck mentality vs. Hard Work and Fair Play Wall Street can be likened to a battle of two fathers over the moral consciousness of a son. This is not the only movie where Stone used this concept. His Vietnam War movie Platoon also shares this conflict (where Charlie Sheen also portrays the role of the â€Å"son† torn between two fathers, one good and another evil). In Wall Street, Carl Fox and Gordon Gekko represent the two opposing sides in the contest over the moral beliefs of Bud Fox, the â€Å"son†. Gekko represents the cutthroat businessman who resorts to all means to gain the biggest profit in the easiest way. He does so through illegal means but not without justification. The list of his reasons is not uncommon and yet is still popularly used even up to these times to justify wrongdoings. These include excuses like â€Å"Everybody does it†, â€Å"There’s something in this for everybody†, â€Å"Nobody gets hurt†, â€Å"As long as we don’t get caught†, etc. This promotes dishonesty in business dealings. You read "Wall Street" in category "Essay examples" But as shown by Gekko, it is this type of people who get to be on top of the hill. The ruthless, the cunning, or the relentless are the ones who succeed and eat up those who strive to compete in the merciless world of business. The implication of the justifications Gekko provides for his actions can be summed up in the common adage, saying that â€Å"if you can’t beat them, join them†. Surely, there are other people in the real world that are similar in nature to Gekko, people who become extremely successful using unethical methods. Competing with these people is one Herculean task to surmount. Thus, there are those who give up on competing with such sharks on ethical grounds and are consequently influenced to follow their lead. In today’s world, it is not surprising to find people like Gekko and the quick-buck mentality that they adhere to, where they prioritize profit over anything else including morals and services to their clients. On the other hand, Carl Fox represents the people who advocate hard work and honesty in business dealings. Carl Fox is not the only character in the film that adheres to such philosophy. One superior of Bud in the Wall Street firm stated, in one of the earlier scenes, that â€Å"good things sometimes take time.† He cites IBM and Hilton as examples. This is a direct contrast to Gekko’s impatient and short-term approach towards business. Success, via the ethical way, takes time. But eventually it will come to those who work hard and remain ethical in their ways. This kind of thinking seems to be overshadowed by the prevalent success of the Gekko-like businessmen. Despite that, there are those who remain stern to keeping their methods unstained by illegalities. They preach that hard work will reap its benefits but it takes time. Gekko scoffs at this conception citing his father as an example of a hardworking man who worked all his life and died of mediocrity. In the present day, there are those who steadfastly hold on to this principle despite all the satirical points made against their cause. Bud Fox in the movie represents the â€Å"son† torn between two fathers, namely Gekko and Carl. He is the student confused on which school of thought to pursue, the quick-buck or fair play. This is actually a mirror of today’s world. Stone intended this movie to reflect the rugged financial wheeling and dealing that is actually happening, especially at the time when the movie was made. The playing field is so dominated by players who have regard profit, wealth and winning above any other consideration. What Bud Fox represents is the individual player who is given a choice on which side to choose, the cunning majority or the blue-collar minority. Stone’s message is a dark warning for those who follow Gekko’s way. As one of Bud’s bosses says it, â€Å"Enjoy it while it lasts, because it never does.† The film ends with both Fox and Gekko getting prosecuted. They may enjoy the riches brought about by their illegal actions but time will come when their misdoings will collect their due. Meanwhile, those who do not heed the call of the â€Å"easy money† are bound to have no worries of retribution. Greed is good? The highlight of the film, what significantly won Michael Douglas his Oscar for Acting, is the scene where he delivers the Greed is Good speech. Such conception was the popular mindset (and alibi) for the profit-obsessed culture in the 1980s market that Stone was criticizing. By this scene, Stone shows his viewers the kind of eloquence and guts that people like Gekko have in defending the actions they do. This scene masterfully and powerfully provides that illustration. Gekko’s claims, amazingly delivered by Douglas, provide a chill to the spine of viewers as it shows just how ruthless and yet appealingly logical Gekko is. He delivers the speech with such composure and bravado that merits cheers and jubilation among his audience and silences his detractors despite the obvious disreputability of his catchphrase. The setting here is that Gekko is trying to take over a company, Teldar Paper. In a shareholders meeting of such company, company management oppose such planned take over by Gekko mainly because of Gekko’s reputation as a company raider. Gekko, on the other hand, rebuffs this voiced out opposition with this grand speech, provided here in part: The point is, ladies and gentlemen: Greed, for lack of a better word, is good. Greed is right; greed works. Greed clarifies, cuts through, and captures the essence of the evolutionary spirit. Greed, in all of its forms, greed for life, for money, for love, knowledge – has marked the upward surge of mankind and greed, you mark my words – will save not only Teldar Paper but that other malfunctioning corporation called the USA. At first look, he may have a point. As evidenced by the acceptance of his audience, it seems as though Gekko has indeed made a very convincing statement. All development can be traced to man’s insatiable hunger for life, money, love, knowledge, etc. as noted by Gekko. It is seemingly logical to think that greed is the driving force behind every single successful venture of man. If that is so, then it is just right to teach people to be greedy. Right? If this was the case, then the movie should have ended with a decisive statement that Gekko never gets caught. But Stone had a different view. Stone included this speech in the movie to showcase up to what absurd lengths people like Gekko go to in order to twist the facts and values long-cherished by society just to justify their cause and actions. Greed is wanting in excess of something that is never meant to be one’s own. It is an excessive desire to possess more than one needs or deserves. Anything in excess is wrong and can never be good, as declared in Nicomachean ethics. This just proves how twisted Gekko and his kind are. They turn something innately bad to something good just to satisfy their inner selves that there is nothing wrong with what they are doing. They are blinded by their greed on what is truly wrong and write. Greed overcomes them. The desire for winning the deal is more dominant than observing ethics. Even the rewards of money and luxurious living are never enough if one is overrun by greed. In the movie, Gekko and Bud are enjoying the luxurious life yet the audience never gets to examine the splendor of their riches as these are only shown in passing. Such is the life dedicated to greed. It doesn’t give room to gloat in the rewards because it constantly seeks more. The concept of enough eludes them. When Bud confronts Gekko of how much is enough, Gekko struggles to answer. Greed does that to a person. Greed corrupts. Too much of anything corrupts to a point where the boundaries between right and wrong are breached just to temporarily satisfy and insatiable appetite for winning the deal. Greed twists the morality of a person. It changes the priorities of a person involved, in a deal; greed is self-serving instead of serving what the deal embodies, which is the people that will benefit from it. It is this moral corruption that Stone exposes through this movie, the moral corruption brought about by wealth and greed. The legal corruption is only set as a backdrop amidst the crisis in morality that the protagonist of the film is going through. CONCLUSION Oliver Stone’s main message in this film is that the ways of the wicked will ultimately fail. He concludes the movie by Gekko getting caught on tape with a confession of his illegal acts after he falls for a trap set by Bud and the SEC. Bud is also indicted for the things he did while employed by Gekko. The last scene shows him walking towards his sentencing. This ending can be classified as a traditional one. It gives the viewers the old impression that â€Å"good† ultimately triumphs over â€Å"evil†. If the movie happened in reality though, there would have been a very different ending. There is one observable major flaw in the movie. One can only speculate on the reasons why such flaw can be bypassed by Stone (either corporate pressure to leave a good ending or it’s a pun to the romanticism of movies). If Gekko is such a cold, calculating and cunning man, it is highly doubtful whether he would let himself be trapped by such methods. It is more doubtful if he would allow himself to be seen with Bud after Bud was unceremoniously arrested. It is also unlikely that Gekko would not anticipate a wire on Bud when they met near the end of the movie. In summation, the ending is highly doubtful. The relevance of such obvious flaw is that it leaves its viewers (at least, those who recognized such flaw) with no hope of romanticist ideals that such a conflict can be resolved easily. In today’s world, there are a number of Gekko’s around. The flaw of the movie makes viewers realize that a number of Gekko’s out there do exist and are left unscathed and undetected (maybe even untouchable). It is then left to the viewer what to do with such fact of life. Surrounded by sharks and unethical financial players, the present financial manager is faced with a choice, the Gekko-way or the hard way. The movie ends with an easy resolution promoting an ideal situation where the â€Å"bad† guys fail. In the real world, that may not always be the case. It is up to the person whether to abide by ethics and laws in financial dealings or bend such laws and ethical rules because there are those who get away with it and they are the ones on top. The movie provides two ways towards success, the hard and long way or the easy way where rules are only part of the show. Reference: 1. Stone, O.   (1987). Wall Street. California: 20th Century Fox.    How to cite Wall Street, Essay examples

Does God Exist 2 free essay sample

Does God Exist? # 8211 ; Aquinas Essay, Research Paper Does God Exist? Since the beginning of clip, adult male has been fighting to reply the inquiry, how did we acquire here? What or who was responsible for the creative activity of life and the universe? It seemed natural to reason that at that place must hold been a higher power that created the world known by adult male. However, how does one turn out the being of such a God? This has been the major preoccupation of theologists and philosophers which began several hundred old ages before Jesus Christ, and has continued to be the topic of het argument of all time since. We readily accept the existence and everything contained within it, but can # 8217 ; t seem to hold upon how it got here in the first topographic point. After all, saying that God exists and so really turn outing His being are two different things, and the latter can turn out to be a instead dashing undertaking. Most early philosophers maintained that God most surely did be and attempted to utilize scientific statements to turn out their point. However, possibly the most quoted philosopher on the absolute being of God is non a scientist, but instead, possibly more suitably, a theologist. St. Thomas Aquinas was a pupil of doctrine and was influential in integrating doctrine into the spiritual philosophy, which provides the foundation for the contemporary Roman Catholic spiritual beliefs. Saint thomass examined the inquiry of God # 8217 ; s being in great item in his philosophical plants, Summa Theologica and Summa Contra Gentiles. He wrote, # 8220 ; Get downing with reasonable things, our mind is led to the point of cognizing about God that He exists, and other such features that must be attributed to the First Principle # 8221 ; . Aquinas had the typical philosopher outlook by asseverating that it can non be merely simply accepted that God exists, since this contention is non instantly evident. It is a declaration that must be proven. In other words, religion entirely is non sufficient adequate grounds to reason that God exists. Aquinas pointed out that what may be conceived in the mind does non needfully exists in world ( Grace, 1996 ) . To do his ain instance sing this issue, Aquinas established his five standards on the being of God through Summa Theologica, the first three of which became known signifier the footing of the cosmogonic statement corroborating God # 8217 ; s being. The five ways Aquinas used to corroborate the being of God all stemmed from a first cause statement. In other words, life perpetuates itself as one cause prompts the happening of an event that becomes the cause for a subsequent event and so on through eternity. However, at some point, there had to be a first cause, which set these wheels into gesture, which is the being normally referred to as God. In the First Way, Aquinas established that everything that is finite undergoes alteration, and by following these consecutive alterations, finite adult male is finally led to God. Until this happens, finite objects can non be changed. Aquinas # 8217 ; Second Way is based upon the theory of causality, which is a elaborate account of how the foremost cause is the lone account for continual # 8220 ; cause and consequence # 8221 ; of the existence. Following, Aquinas established the standards of a # 8216 ; necessity # 8217 ; of being. In other words, something can non come from nil. There had to be a transeunt being in topographic point for all being to germinate. He wrote, # 8220 ; We discovery in nature things that are possible to be and non to be # 8230 ; . But it is impossible for these things to ever be, for that which is possible non to be at some clip is non. Therefore, if everything is possible non to be, so at one clip there could hold been nil in existence. # 8221 ; In other words, if there were no being historically, nil would be at the present clip. Since being is non in inquiry today, there must hold been an ageless being that started it all # 8211 ; God. By the 19th century, philosophers were non rather so content to blindly accept the being of God. Certain incredulity began to predominate, and this was reflected in the doctrine of the clip period. Possibly one of the most articulate spokesmen who argued against the being of God was British philosopher David Hume, the laminitis of the # 8217 ; disbelieving school of philosophy. # 8217 ; He openly criticized Aquinas # 8217 ; # 8220 ; foremost do # 8221 ; theory as an uneffective statement, inquiring, # 8220 ; What was the cause of the First Cause? # 8221 ; . He and others pointed out, rather justly, if every happening must hold a cause, what makes anyone conclude that it began with God? There has neer been a valid statement set uping God as the # 8216 ; First Cause # 8217 ; harmonizing to David Hume. Of class, it should possibly be pointed out that oppositions of Hume have taken the theological # 8220 ; high route, # 8221 ; keeping that it is assumed that in the moral order, everything Begins with God, and this is a procedure that is beyond inquiry. Furthermore, harmonizing to Hume, Aquinas # 8217 ; statement is philosophically flawed because he makes the premise that the features of the parts equal the features of the whole. In other words, merely because some effects in the existence may be attributed to a cause does non intend that the full existence can be traced to one root cause. After all, if God is the cause of the existence, this means that God is a cause onto Himself. Why can # 8217 ; t the creative activity of the universe be explained in similar footings? Staying ever the skeptic, Hume # 8217 ; s argument Michigans short of claiming that God does non be, which would be godlessness. Rather, he regarded his undertaking as projecting sensible uncertainty as to whether or non God exists, which is agnosticism. David Hume farther expounded on his unconventional spiritual doctrine in his 1757 essay, The Natural History of Religion. He suggested that people continued to believe in the being of God because they were conditioned to make so. Hume wrote: Our ascendants in Europe, before the resurgence of letters, believed, as we do at nowadays, that there was one supreme God, the writer of nature, whose power, though in itself unmanageable, was yet frequently exerted by the interjection of his angels and subsidiary curates, who executed his sacred intents. But they besides believed, that all nature was full of other unseeable powers, faeries, hobs, elves, sprits, existences, stronger and mightier than work forces, but much inferior to the heavenly natures, who surround the throne of God. Hume # 8217 ; s deduction is clear: If adult male did non believe in the being of God, he would incur considerable wrath from above. Hume continued by asseverating that literature had much to make with public perceptual experience of God and of His being. Ancient Greek poets bestowed upon their honored Gods homo qualities they knew their compatriots could easy associate to. It was this # 8216 ; nescient # 8217 ; ancient Greek position of God offered by the Grecian poets and Aristotle, upon which the God # 8217 ; s existence theory of Thomas Aquinas was based. Hume asserted that the original religion placed in God # 8217 ; s being grew from the uneducated multitudes that developed the myth of an almighty Perfect Being who was responsible for the creative activity of everything that could non be explained. These people could non explicate such natural phenomenons as lightning or temblors so they attributed them to some higher power. Today there are empirical, scientific accounts for these happenings. The possibility exists that someday scientific discipline will someway be able to turn out or confute the theory that God exists. With both points of position presented, which, if either, is right? Aquinas # 8217 ; statement, an admirable theoretical account of deductive logical thinking, is missing in scientific cogency. Hume argued, possibly right, that this historical description of a natural and moral order merely grew from adult male # 8217 ; s want to populate an ordered being, non from God # 8217 ; s being. Peoples will everlastingly be reasoning around their dinner tabular arraies about the being of God. Many take comfort in the belief that there is one Godhead who still exists in the existence, a perfect being who watches out for His # 8216 ; imperfect # 8217 ; kids. However, the statement that God exists because he was the # 8216 ; First Cause # 8217 ; of everything is excessively simplistic for the sophisticated mind to accept. It may be spiritually soothing to believe in the being of a higher power, but there is no incontrovertible grounds to propose that God was # 8216 ; the cause # 8217 ; of everything, therefore turn outing His being. As we approach the new millenary, incredulity prevails and continues to reign supreme. Grace, R. Jeffrey. A Report on Summa Contra Gentiles Book One: God by Thomas Aquinas [ Online ] . October 1996. Available: hypertext transfer protocol: //www.electriciti.com/~rjgrace/scg.htm. Hume, David. The Natural History of Religion [ Online ] . 1757. Available: hypertext transfer protocol: //www.utm.edu/research/hume/wri/nhr/nhr. Porter, Burton F. ( editor ) . Religion A ; Reason: An Anthology. New York: St. Martin # 8217 ; s Press, Inc. , 1993. Stairs, Allen. The Cosmologic Argument [ Online ] . March 1998. Available: hypertext transfer protocol: //brindedcow.umd.edu/236/aquinas.html. Titus, Harold H. , and Smith, Marilyn S. Living Issues in Philosophy ( Sixth Edition ) . New York: D. Van Nostrand Company, 1974. Thompson, Karl F. ( editor ) . Thomas Aquinas # 8217 ; Summa Contra Gentiles. Classicss of Western Thought: II. Middle Ages, Renaissance, and Reformation. New York: Harcourt Brace Jovanovich, 1973.